Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 4:21:37 GMT
Or if we see it looming or suspect it is like the Bolsonaro or Trumpism effect in local tunes we don’t know how to find the appropriate political response even though part of the culture battle has been won or we simply resign ourselves and go out The inability to continue playing football in solitude is increasingly cancelled, as is the case in the environmentalist space, allowing Argentina to continue to fall prey to this polarization. Even so it's worth asking why this anger, this restlessness, this exhaustion isn't exploited by the political left, where there are cadres as powerful as Miriam Bregman or even someone as charismatic as Juan Grabois.
Trying to recreate a space for a centre-left whose leadership synthesized the values of and collective solidarity. Trotskyism was indeed progressing, but it goes without saying that in a Peronized country like Argentina it was always difficult to understand the people. objection to the vote. Trotskyism has always been passive. Although in recent Guinea Email List years it has put new issues on the agenda, it has usually returned to its original workersism, as happened with the question of the precariat, because it was the first politics to raise this question. and its organizational form, ideology, are like an impenetrable wall. On the other hand Grabois did draw from the great roots of Peronism.
His big mistake was that he did not know that he did not want to separate himself from Kirchnerism which is also the worst version of history. The latest variant of Christian Kirchnerism is exhausted and its only effective capacity, other than to collapse the current government from within, is to continue to co-opt and monopolize the space it no longer represents and the remaining progressive forces of the left also voluntarily surrender. Grabois did not seek to create a center-left force independent of Kirchnerism but sought to merge with it or even represent it in its purest version. His speech was not a call to other spaces to generate new lines of political accumulation from the centre-left but rather an improvised return to Kirchnerism.
Trying to recreate a space for a centre-left whose leadership synthesized the values of and collective solidarity. Trotskyism was indeed progressing, but it goes without saying that in a Peronized country like Argentina it was always difficult to understand the people. objection to the vote. Trotskyism has always been passive. Although in recent Guinea Email List years it has put new issues on the agenda, it has usually returned to its original workersism, as happened with the question of the precariat, because it was the first politics to raise this question. and its organizational form, ideology, are like an impenetrable wall. On the other hand Grabois did draw from the great roots of Peronism.
His big mistake was that he did not know that he did not want to separate himself from Kirchnerism which is also the worst version of history. The latest variant of Christian Kirchnerism is exhausted and its only effective capacity, other than to collapse the current government from within, is to continue to co-opt and monopolize the space it no longer represents and the remaining progressive forces of the left also voluntarily surrender. Grabois did not seek to create a center-left force independent of Kirchnerism but sought to merge with it or even represent it in its purest version. His speech was not a call to other spaces to generate new lines of political accumulation from the centre-left but rather an improvised return to Kirchnerism.
kav_p